首页> 外文OA文献 >And it's good night Vienna. How (not) to deal with the populist radical right: The conservatives, UKIP and some lessons from the heartland
【2h】

And it's good night Vienna. How (not) to deal with the populist radical right: The conservatives, UKIP and some lessons from the heartland

机译:这是维也纳的晚安。如何(不)处理民粹主义的激进权利:保守派,UKIP和来自内地的一些教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mainstream parties across Europe have been struggling for some time to counter the appeal of the populist radical right. With the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), the British Conservative Party is now facing a similar challenge. We argue that, since this is the case, it makes sense to ask whether there are lessons it can learn from other countries-in particular Austria, where the centre-right People's Party (Ã\u96VP) has been competing against the populist radical right (most obviously, the Freedom Party) for almost three decades. In the course of so doing, the Ã\u96VP has tried many ways to deal with the threat posed: treating the populist radical right as a pariah; adopting some of its policies and rhetoric; inviting it into coalition government; and finally pursuing a 'dual-track' approach. We evaluate each strategy in turn and find that none of them has enjoyed huge or lasting success. We conclude that the Conservatives need to realise that UKIP is not so much a problem to be solved as a situation to be managed. Seeking to toughen the Tory stance on immigration and asylum is unlikely to pay electoral dividends and carries with it considerable downsides in terms of the party's credibility and reputation, as well as in terms of public policy. Moreover, even if a more restrictive stance does not prove entirely pointless or (worse) positively counterproductive, it imposes opportunity costs the Conservative Party should think twice before paying. All this suggests the value of a comparative approach to those wanting to understand the new dynamics in British politics. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
机译:欧洲的主流政党已经为争取民粹主义激进权利的呼吁而奋斗了一段时间。随着英国独立党(UKIP)的崛起,英国保守党现在也面临着类似的挑战。我们认为,既然是这样,那就问一下是否可以从其他国家(尤其是奥地利)那里汲取教训,中右翼人民党(Ã\ u96VP)一直在与民粹主义激进权利竞争(最明显的是,自由党)持续了近三十年。在此过程中,u96VP尝试了多种方法来应对所构成的威胁:将民粹主义激进权利视为贱民;采取一些政策和措辞;邀请其加入联合政府;最后追求“双轨制”方法。我们依次评估每种策略,发现没有一种方法能获得巨大或持久的成功。我们得出的结论是,保守党需要意识到UKIP并不是要解决的问题,而是要解决的问题。寻求加强保守党在移民和庇护方面的立场不太可能给选举带来红利,并且在党的信誉和声誉以及公共政策方面都具有相当大的弊端。而且,即使限制性更强的立场不能证明完全毫无意义,也不能((更糟))产生适得其反的效果,但它会增加机会成本,保守党在付钱之前应该三思而行。所有这些都表明,比较方法对于那些希望了解英国政治新动态的人具有价值。 ©2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gruber, O; Bale, T;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号